Apogee AD-16X Brochure - Page 4

Parcourez en ligne ou téléchargez le pdf Brochure pour {nom_de_la_catégorie} Apogee AD-16X. Apogee AD-16X 7 pages. Audio interface system
Également pour Apogee AD-16X : Spécifications (2 pages), Manuel de révision (3 pages)

Apogee AD-16X Brochure
computer
o n t e s t
recording system
A P O G E E S Y M P H O N Y
If You Please, Maestro
The AD16X & DA16X Converters
Released in 2004, the AD16X and DA16X were the successors to Apogee's
previously popular 24-bit AD16 and DA16 converters, with the 'X' in the
names denoting support for the X-Series cards that were originally introduced
for the Rosetta 800. Other significant improvements included support for
192kHz sampling and the inclusion of the same C777 clock technology used
in Apogee's Big Ben digital master clock, famous for its low jitter.
The AD16X and DA16X each support either 16 channels of A-D or D-A
conversion, respectively, and, accordingly, each unit has 16 analogue
connections (from two 25-pin D-connectors that require breakout cables),
along with both ADAT and AES connections (the latter via a 25-pin
D-connector). Each converter has four ADAT ports (only two are used at
44.1/48kHz rates) to support S/MUX (sample multiplex) modes that allow
either 16 channels at 88.2/96kHz or eight channels at 192kHz. To allow all
16-channels of A-D or D-A conversion to operate at 192kHz you either need to
use the AES ports in stand-alone mode, or an X-Series card, such as an
X-Symphony, as described in the main text.
Once you use an AD16X or DA16X with an X-Series card, the
digital ports effectively become redundant, because either the
digital input to or output from the converter will being handled by
the X-series card instead of the converter's own digital interface. To
take advantage of this redundancy, Apogee added an extra mode of
operation to the converters, called Advanced mode — the regular,
default mode is referred to as Standard mode — that allows you to
make use of both the digital and analogue connections simultaneously when
the converter is using an X-Series card. With the AD16X, for example, you can
get 16 channels of A-D (input) conversion, and 16 channels of digital output
via the onboard digital connections. With the DA16X you get 16 channels of
D-A (output) conversion with 16 channels of digital input.
As you can imagine, Advanced mode is pretty useful when these converters
form part of a Symphony system; if you don't require analogue input and
output for every channel in the system, using the AD16X and DA16X
converters in Advanced mode provides a number of digital inputs or outputs
for connecting to other digital devices in your studio. It also means you need
fewer converters. In Standard mode each converter provides either
138
www.soundonsound.com
Maestro
Maestro
Maestro
september 2007
Total Mix
Maestro
Pro Tools
Logic Pro
16 channels of input or 16 channels of output, so four converters (two
AD16Xs and two DA16Xs) are required to handle the 32 channels of input and
output supported by a single Symphony PCI card. In Advanced mode, however,
because each converter now offers both 16 channels of input and 16 channels
of output, only two converters are required to provide 32 channels of input
and output.
Sonically, the AD16 and DA16 converters are, as you would imagine and
hope given Apogee's pedigree, pretty good. Judging A-D and D-A converters is
always highly subjective, especially at the higher end of the market, and
having listened to many converter shoot-outs over the years, one thing you
notice about high-end converters is that, quite honestly, the differences
between competing units can be very small indeed. Personally, I've found the
AD16 gives a certain clarity to the sound that I like, especially at higher
sampling rates, maintaining the detail of what's being recorded in a very
flattering way.
Talking about the high end of the market, it's worth noting that the AD16
and DA16 converters are priced quite affordably compared to far more
expensive models from companies like Prism and Genex, and many engineers
I know prefer the AD16s to more expensive offerings from other companies.
A friend of mine recently did a blind test on a scoring stage with the AD16s
competing against more expensive converters from another reputable
company, and everyone on the stage apparently preferred the Apogees. While
the quality of converters can be highly subjective, and other engineers may
disagree with my assessment and anecdotes, that the AD16 and DA16s fall
into the category where we can discuss them subjectively rather than
technically is perhaps the highest compliment.