Dell PowerEdge External Media System 1634 Manual - Página 24
Procurar online ou descarregar pdf Manual para Servidor Dell PowerEdge External Media System 1634. Dell PowerEdge External Media System 1634 38 páginas. Statement of volatility
Também para Dell PowerEdge External Media System 1634: Manual de iniciação (12 páginas), Manual (29 páginas), Utilização do manual (16 páginas), Configuração (16 páginas), Manual (10 páginas)
Improving NFS Performance on HPC Clusters with Dell Fluid Cache for DAS
Figure 13 shows that on a cold-cache read for the random tests, peak IOPS of the DFC configurations
drop from ~123,000 IOPs to ~80,000 IOPs. Interestingly this is higher than the baseline IOPs of ~9,300,
and explained below.
Figure 14 helps explain why the cold-cache read behavior is different for sequential and random I/O. It
uses the output of fldcstat, a utility provided by DFC that displays statistics for the DFC
configuration.
8000
6000
4000
2000
0
-2000
-4000
-6000
-8000
-10000
Random Reads-coldcache
One piece of information provided by fldcstat is CacheIO-DiskIO. This shows the number of bytes
read and written to the cache device minus the number of bytes read and written to the disk. A
positive value shows IO activity is being served mostly by the cache while, a negative value indicates
more disk IO is being performed than cache IO.
Figure 14 plots CacheIO-DiskIO over the duration of the cold-cache sequential read and random read
tests for the 64 concurrent client test case. From the figure it is seen that during sequential reads
there is a lot of disk IO followed by cache IO. This pattern repeats for the duration of the test. Data is
pulled from the backend disk to the SSDs, served from the SSD, and this cycle is repeated. However for
the random read tests, there is backend disk IO at the start, but the cache quickly warms up and
subsequent read requests are satisfied directly from the cache. This helps explain why cold-cache
sequential reads have low throughput—lower than the DFC-WB configuration, and also lower than the
baseline. Cold-cache random reads do take a hit in IOPS compared to the DFC-WB configuration but,
due to the nature of the small I/O block size (4k) and the longer duration of the test itself, show
significantly better performance than the baseline since the DFC cache warms up very quickly.
Figure 14.
CacheIO-DiskIO on cold-cache reads
fldcstat - CacheIO-DiskIO
Sequential Reads-coldcache
24