Epson Stylus Pro 9600 Photographic Dye Ink Manual de referencia del producto - Página 10

Navegue en línea o descargue pdf Manual de referencia del producto para Software Epson Stylus Pro 9600 Photographic Dye Ink. Epson Stylus Pro 9600 Photographic Dye Ink 28 páginas. Large format digital colour printing
También para Epson Stylus Pro 9600 Photographic Dye Ink: Folleto y especificaciones (24 páginas), Manual de instalación y desembalaje (24 páginas), Manual de información (16 páginas), Lista de piezas (21 páginas), Manual de instalación rápida (34 páginas), Información sobre el producto (15 páginas), Manual de consulta rápida (11 páginas), Folleto y especificaciones (8 páginas), Folleto y especificaciones (6 páginas), Folleto y especificaciones (16 páginas), Especificaciones (4 páginas), Actualización manual (4 páginas)

At the time of purchase, the customer must choose which ink technology they want to use.

With the introduction of EPSON UltraChrome Ink, it will become more difficult to decide

which Epson ink technology to choose. For most customers, EPSON UltraChrome Ink will

be the obvious choice. This breakthrough ink technology will forever change the perception

of pigmented inks. This ink is best for:

The EPSON Photographic Dye Ink, especially when used with EPSON ColorLife media, will

24"

produce stunning photographic prints with lightfastness ratings up to 26 years under glass.

This still outlasts traditional silver halide prints. This ink is best for:

44"

Which Epson Ink Technology Should I Use?

Professional Photography & Fine-art Photography that is intended for display or resale

Commercial Pre-press Proofing workflows when using optional RIP technologies

Any indoor or short-term outdoor display signage

Photography that only requires a lightfastness rating up to 26 years under glass*

Color Comping, General Purpose Graphics, and Business Presentation Graphics

CAD, GIS Mapping, Architecture, etc. where ink costs might be an issue

Any user who does not care about lightfastness and wants the lowest possible

operational costs

rethink.